THUNDERNET, C.A. - Fraud Risk

Low Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 9
100
We consider THUNDERNET, C.A. to be a potentially low fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a low risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 18,946 IP addresses, some of which are running servers. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Thundernet, Thunder Services and Solutions Corp, and Telecom Castilla La Mancha SA. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, little of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 9/100 to THUNDERNET, C.A., meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 9% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"38.51.157.27",
  "score":"100",
  "risk":"very high"
}
                
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of THUNDERNET, C.A. IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 0%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 2%
Public Proxy 0%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of THUNDERNET, C.A. IP addresses which fall under each country:

Venezuela 97%
United States 3%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of THUNDERNET, C.A. IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

Thundernet 73%
Thunder Services and Solutions Corp 20%
Telecom Castilla La Mancha SA 3%
THUNDERNET, C.A 1%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk THUNDERNET, C.A. IP addresses based on our fraud score:

100
38.51.157.27
100
38.51.178.139
100
82.86.100.88
100
82.86.89.36

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.