Scarlet-UNI - Fraud Risk

Medium Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 50
100
We consider Scarlet-UNI to be a potentially medium fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a medium risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 106,064 IP addresses, none of which are running high risk services. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Scarlet Belgium NV, BASE s.a, and Claerhout N.V.. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, some of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 50/100 to Scarlet-UNI, meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 50% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"81.11.139.10",
  "score":"100",
  "risk":"very high"
}
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of Scarlet-UNI IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 0%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 0%
Public Proxy 0%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of Scarlet-UNI IP addresses which fall under each country:

Belgium 100%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of Scarlet-UNI IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

Scarlet Belgium NV 44%
BASE s.a < 1%
Claerhout N.V. < 1%
Easy Access Bvba < 1%
Hino Motors Europe NV < 1%
Switch NV < 1%
IRC Engineering NV < 1%
Cordeel Hoeselt N.V. < 1%
Essec Europe N.V. < 1%
IRC Engineering N.V. < 1%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk Scarlet-UNI IP addresses based on our fraud score:

100
81.11.139.10
100
81.11.239.216

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.