Relx Group PLC - Fraud Risk

Low Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 0
100
We consider Relx Group PLC to be a potentially low fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a low risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 65525 IP addresses, none of which are running high risk services. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Relx Group PLC, Elsevier AWS, and Reed Elsevier Technology Services. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, little of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 0/100 to Relx Group PLC, meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 0% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"145.36.0.0",
  "score":"0",
  "risk":"low"
}
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of Relx Group PLC IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 0%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 0%
Public Proxy 0%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of Relx Group PLC IP addresses which fall under each country:

United Kingdom 98%
United States 1%
Japan < 1%
Netherlands < 1%
Singapore < 1%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of Relx Group PLC IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

Relx Group PLC 84%
Elsevier AWS 13%
Reed Elsevier Technology Services 2%
Reed Elsevier advertisement to Airtel - India < 1%
Reed Elsevier summary advertisement India < 1%
RELX RIPE IntIP < 1%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk Relx Group PLC IP addresses based on our fraud score:

N/A

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.