Polonetwork Limited - Fraud Risk

Low Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 0
100
We consider Polonetwork Limited to be a potentially low fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a low risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 4,340 IP addresses, some of which are running servers, anonymizing VPNs, and public proxies. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Nearoute Limited, Gem Cloud Limited, and Fiberstate. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, little of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 0/100 to Polonetwork Limited, meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 0% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"23.164.184.0",
  "score":"0",
  "risk":"low"
}
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of Polonetwork Limited IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 6%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 7%
Public Proxy 1%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of Polonetwork Limited IP addresses which fall under each country:

Hong Kong 53%
United States 18%
United Kingdom 12%
Taiwan 12%
Japan 6%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of Polonetwork Limited IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

Nearoute Limited 71%
Gem Cloud Limited 12%
Fiberstate 6%
PoloCloud Computing (Hong Kong) Limited 6%
Whatever Networks LLC 6%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk Polonetwork Limited IP addresses based on our fraud score:

N/A

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.