LayerHost - Fraud Risk

High Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 72
100
We consider LayerHost to be a potentially high fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a high risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 182,833 IP addresses, none of which are running high risk services. They manage IP addresses for organisations including LayerHost, Root Networks LLC, and WebXury Inc. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, most of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 72/100 to LayerHost, meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 72% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"123.253.91.18",
  "score":"100",
  "risk":"very high"
}
                
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of LayerHost IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 0%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 0%
Public Proxy 0%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of LayerHost IP addresses which fall under each country:

United States 71%
China 8%
United Kingdom 5%
Canada 5%
Philippines 2%
Indonesia 1%
Morocco 1%
India 1%
Israel 1%
Colombia 1%
Brazil 1%
Taiwan < 1%
Malaysia < 1%
Peru < 1%
Australia < 1%
Thailand < 1%
New Zealand < 1%
Singapore < 1%
Japan < 1%
Turkey < 1%
Ukraine < 1%
France < 1%
North Macedonia < 1%
Finland < 1%
Costa Rica < 1%
Chile < 1%
South Africa < 1%
Romania < 1%
Algeria < 1%
Pakistan < 1%
Mexico < 1%
Poland < 1%
Switzerland < 1%
Vietnam < 1%
Nigeria < 1%
United Arab Emirates < 1%
Italy < 1%
Somalia < 1%
Nicaragua < 1%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of LayerHost IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

LayerHost 18%
Root Networks LLC 15%
WebXury Inc 8%
RaptorNode 3%
Global Frag Networks 3%
ELIDC 2%
Root Level Technology Inc 2%
Layer Host 2%
hlnode 2%
Crnode 1%
EvoVM Networks 1%
Massalha 1%
Vlan24 1%
Randal Burns 1%
Mailboxops 1%
Spiderly Ltd 1%
Genius Guard 1%
E world USA Holding 1%
Aim2Game 1%
hisyam kholid 1%
Wan Hosting and Gaming Services 1%
n3 Networks 1%
White Glove Delivery LLC 1%
Telecom Global Solutions 1%
TeraSwitch Networks Inc. 1%
Business Network Solutions < 1%
Web Omega do Brasil < 1%
Vita < 1%
EE0 Networks < 1%
yunjue < 1%
Jonathan Halterman < 1%
CN2LA < 1%
enlong llc < 1%
K.S.G. Trade Infosystem < 1%
Wang jin cheng < 1%
BOGO < 1%
Nostalrius < 1%
Oliver Fokerd < 1%
idcwk < 1%
Andrew Horton < 1%
personal < 1%
Kicking Savings < 1%
Server < 1%
beijinkeji < 1%
ND Land Scape Design < 1%
Mohamad Kazah < 1%
Sunset Communications < 1%
Black Lotus Communications < 1%
Media Consulting < 1%
Valvps LLC < 1%
Gaje Papponetti < 1%
Hovsepian < 1%
G3 Web Networks < 1%
Jeff Louis < 1%
Clarence Allgood < 1%
InfoAroundTheTown < 1%
Proved Media < 1%
appFigures < 1%
Magix Systems < 1%
Gerald Reynolds < 1%
Gotech Host < 1%
haitaoli < 1%
Jonathan node < 1%
li gang < 1%
Blake and Brown < 1%
Peach-hosting < 1%
Heavyzero < 1%
Hegna < 1%
Lerry Logan < 1%
KSIG < 1%
Guoming Wu < 1%
Mark Ward < 1%
Jack Low < 1%
Mike Friedman < 1%
Michael Ryan Media < 1%
M and N iProperty Inc < 1%
Matt Fraser < 1%
Ansettal international tech inc < 1%
Syahputera < 1%
Joseph Cameron < 1%
HostBarrel < 1%
global business technology < 1%
Jaryl Chiong < 1%
Pankajini M < 1%
Ariel Michaeli < 1%
Arman < 1%
John Vitta < 1%
ND Landscape Design < 1%
Jordan Malesko (Cancel) < 1%
NCL Next < 1%
Michael Gibson < 1%
Roberts < 1%
Matt Palmer < 1%
Foot Quarters < 1%
Howard Chang < 1%
Dexhost < 1%
Junyong Song < 1%
digiclickhosting < 1%
Distinction Media < 1%
dylan barritt < 1%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk LayerHost IP addresses based on our fraud score:

100
123.253.91.18
67
123.253.91.10
50
123.253.91.2

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.