Daniel Jackson - Fraud Risk

Medium Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 25
100
We consider Daniel Jackson to be a potentially medium fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a medium risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 5,103 IP addresses, some of which are running servers. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Daniel Jackson, FOP Dmytro Nedilskyi, and Brightbox Systems Ltd. Scamalytics see low levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, little of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 25/100 to Daniel Jackson, meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 25% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
  "ip":"194.213.3.220",
  "score":"100",
  "risk":"very high"
}
            
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.

IPs by Service

The percentage of Daniel Jackson IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:

Anonymizing VPN 0%
Tor Exit Node 0%
Server 2%
Public Proxy 0%
Web Proxy 0%

Percentage IPs by Country

The percentage of Daniel Jackson IP addresses which fall under each country:

United Kingdom 90%
Ukraine 10%

Percentage IPs by Organisation

The percentage of Daniel Jackson IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:

Daniel Jackson 55%
FOP Dmytro Nedilskyi 10%
Brightbox Systems Ltd 5%
Daniel James Jackson 5%
DigiRDP LLC 5%
Interlir 5%
Ipxo Limited 5%
Pitline Ltd 5%
Redestel Networks S.L 5%

IPs by Fraud Score

The highest risk Daniel Jackson IP addresses based on our fraud score:

100
194.213.3.220

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.