Cyberzone S.A. - Fraud Risk
Medium Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
We consider Cyberzone S.A. to be a potentially medium fraud risk ISP, by which we mean that web traffic from this ISP potentially poses a medium risk of being fraudulent. Other types of traffic may pose a different risk or no risk. They operate 88,467 IP addresses, some of which are running anonymizing VPNs. They manage IP addresses for organisations including Cyberzone S.A, Cyberzone SA, and Private Customer. Scamalytics see high levels of web traffic from this ISP across our global network, little of which is, in our view, fraudulent. We apply a risk score of 25/100 to Cyberzone S.A., meaning that of the web traffic where we have visibility, approximately 25% is suspected to be potentially fraudulent.
IP Fraud Risk API
{
"ip":"145.223.7.22",
"score":"100",
"risk":"very high"
}
IPs by Service
The percentage of Cyberzone S.A. IP addresses which point to servers hosting high risk services:
| Anonymizing VPN | 12% |
|---|---|
| Tor Exit Node | 0% |
| Server | 0% |
| Public Proxy | 0% |
| Web Proxy | 0% |
Percentage IPs by Country
The percentage of Cyberzone S.A. IP addresses which fall under each country:
| United States | 35% |
|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9% |
| Netherlands | 5% |
| Germany | 5% |
| Australia | 5% |
| Japan | 4% |
| Canada | 3% |
| Singapore | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 3% |
| France | 2% |
| Brazil | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1% |
| South Africa | 1% |
| Poland | 1% |
| Italy | 1% |
| Albania | 1% |
| Greece | 1% |
| Turkey | 1% |
| Morocco | 1% |
| India | 1% |
| Austria | 1% |
| Myanmar | < 1% |
| Mongolia | < 1% |
| Macao | < 1% |
| North Macedonia | < 1% |
| Mexico | < 1% |
| Montenegro | < 1% |
| Malaysia | < 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | < 1% |
| Nepal | < 1% |
| Republic of Moldova | < 1% |
| Panama | < 1% |
| Philippines | < 1% |
| Azerbaijan | < 1% |
| Pakistan | < 1% |
| Costa Rica | < 1% |
| Puerto Rico | < 1% |
| Portugal | < 1% |
| Paraguay | < 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | < 1% |
| Thailand | < 1% |
| Argentina | < 1% |
| Armenia | < 1% |
| Uruguay | < 1% |
| Uzbekistan | < 1% |
| Venezuela | < 1% |
| Vietnam | < 1% |
| Andorra | < 1% |
| Indonesia | < 1% |
| Chile | < 1% |
| Czechia | < 1% |
| Belize | < 1% |
| Algeria | < 1% |
| Ecuador | < 1% |
| Egypt | < 1% |
| Spain | < 1% |
| Finland | < 1% |
| Bhutan | < 1% |
| Bahamas | < 1% |
| Georgia | < 1% |
| Ghana | < 1% |
| Greenland | < 1% |
| Bolivia | < 1% |
| Monaco | < 1% |
| Isle of Man | < 1% |
| Iceland | < 1% |
| Brunei | < 1% |
| Bangladesh | < 1% |
| Cambodia | < 1% |
| South Korea | < 1% |
| Laos | < 1% |
| Liechtenstein | < 1% |
| Sri Lanka | < 1% |
| Republic of Lithuania | < 1% |
| Luxembourg | < 1% |
| Kazakhstan | < 1% |
| Latvia | < 1% |
Percentage IPs by Organisation
The percentage of Cyberzone S.A. IP addresses which fall under each organization for whom they manage IPs:
| Cyberzone S.A | 4% |
|---|---|
| Cyberzone SA | 2% |
| Private Customer | 1% |
| Cyberzone S.A. | 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (India) | 1% |
| Brander Group Inc | 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Greenland) | < 1% |
| "Mobile Business Solutions" MBS LLP | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Isle of Man) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Liechtenstein) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Macao) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Monaco) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Mongolia) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Montenegro) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Morocco) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Myanmar) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Nepal) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Panama) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Sri Lanka) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Uruguay) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Venezuela) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Viet Nam) | < 1% |
| Ipxo Limited | < 1% |
| Packhub S A | < 1% |
| Surfshark Ltd | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Egypt) | < 1% |
| Aventice LLC | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Georgia) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Algeria) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Andorra) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Armenia) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Bahamas) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Bangladesh) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Belize) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Bhutan) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Bolivia) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Brunei Darussalam) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Cambodia) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Costa Rica) | < 1% |
| Cyberzon S.A (Ecuador) | < 1% |
| Ipxong3 | < 1% |
| SIA Latnet | < 1% |
| Mobile Business Solution LLP | < 1% |
| Munaikurylys-Emba LLP | < 1% |
| Bonatti S.p.A | < 1% |
| Kolzhan-Oil LLP | < 1% |
| Ideal Market LLP | < 1% |
| Greenland | < 1% |
| Atyrau Penopolistirol Product LLP | < 1% |
| Rutlege LLP | < 1% |
| Uskokz | < 1% |
| Usko | < 1% |
| Tikhin Mobill LLP | < 1% |
| Ak Zhayik LLP | < 1% |
| SpecStroyProect LLP | < 1% |
| Walker | < 1% |
| Vivat Atyrau | < 1% |
| Sazankurak | < 1% |
| Rodnik LLP | < 1% |
| Ak-zhaik7 LLP | < 1% |
| Altel | < 1% |
| Lucas | < 1% |
| Kaznigri LLP | < 1% |
| KazNIGRI | < 1% |
| JSC Atyrau Bransh | < 1% |
| Atyrau branch of JGC Corporation | < 1% |
| Caspiy Atager LLP | < 1% |
| Computer World LLP | < 1% |
IPs by Fraud Score
The highest risk Cyberzone S.A. IP addresses based on our fraud score:
IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:
Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:
IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.
Fraudulent IP Addresses
© 2026 Scamalytics Ltd