216.131.105.67 Fraud Risk

High Risk
← Lowest Risk
Highest Risk →
0
Fraud Score: 67
100
IP address 216.131.105.67 is operated by NETPR-BRU-DP whose web traffic we consider to present a potentially high fraud risk. Non-web traffic may present a different risk or no risk at all. Scamalytics see low levels of traffic from NETPR-BRU-DP across our global network, some of which we suspect to be potentially fraudulent. We have no visibility into the web traffic directly from 216.131.105.67, and therefore apply a risk score of 67/100 based on the overall risk from NETPR-BRU-DP’s IP addresses where we do have visibility. If you see web traffic from this IP address there is potentially a high risk that it is criminals engaged in fraudulent activity. Other types of traffic may present a different risk or no risk. The device on 216.131.105.67 is operating an anonymising VPN, which could be proxying traffic from another geographical location. The geographical location of 216.131.105.67 is in Belgium, however the geographical location of the user could be anywhere in the world.
IP Fraud Risk API
    {
      "ip":"216.131.105.67",
      "score":"67",
      "risk":"high"
    }
            
Click here for details of our free usage tier, free trial, and pricing information.
Operator
Hostname 67.105.131.216.x.reliablehosting.com
ASN 62651
ISP Name Strong Technology
Organization Name NETPR-BRU-DP
Connection type n/a
Location
Country Name Belgium
Country Code BE
State / Province Flanders
District / County Flemish Brabant
City Zaventem
Postal Code 1930
Latitude 50.901
Longitude 4.48557
Proxies
Anonymizing VPN
Yes
Tor Exit Node
No
Server
No
Public Proxy
No
Web Proxy
No
Search Engine Robot
No
Domain Names
67.105.131.216.x.reliablehosting.com

IP Address data partner DB-IP.com:

DB-IP

Proxy data sponsored by IP2Proxy:

IP2Proxy

IMPORTANT: Scamalytics Ltd operate a fraud-detection network with visibility into many millions of internet users per month. We do not have visibility into the entire internet. The statements on this page represent our opinion based on the limited information we have available to us, and specifically only cover web connections made by internet users to websites and applications, not other connections such as server to server connections.